Breast Implant Complications in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

In an extraordinary case study, researchers discovered two independent fibrotic capsules surrounding a single textured breast implant in a 59-year-old patient with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS). This finding highlights the intricate interplay between genetic collagen defects and external mechanical forces. The study demonstrates that mechanical stress can locally override the characteristic disorganized collagen architecture seen in EDS, creating a highly organized and inflamed environment around the implant. These insights are crucial for understanding complications associated with textured implants, including chronic inflammation, capsular contracture, and risks like breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).

Beyond the immediate findings, this case study holds implications for the broader fields of surgical materials science and connective tissue biology. The study’s conclusions are particularly timely given ongoing debates about the safety of textured implants and their potential role in adverse inflammatory conditions like breast implant illness. Notably, these findings align with emerging evidence suggesting a potential link between breast implant illness (BII) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS). By offering deeper insights into these mechanisms, this case underscores the need for more research.

Background

Textured breast implants were initially developed to improve implant positioning and reduce complications like capsular contracture. However, their rough surface has been linked to prolonged inflammation, increasing the risk of rare conditions such as BIA-ALCL. In EDS, a genetic disorder affecting collagen synthesis, tissues typically exhibit weak and disorganized collagen. This study challenges conventional expectations, showing how mechanical forces can locally override genetic collagen defects and create atypical tissue responses.

Insights into EDS and Collagen Biology

EDS is caused by mutations in genes like COL5A, which disrupt the formation and organization of collagen fibrils. Normally, these defects result in disorganized, wavy collagen. However, this case illustrates how a high mechanical stress environment, induced by the textured implant, can stimulate the alignment and maturation of collagen fibers, effectively bypassing the usual characteristics of EDS. This phenomenon underscores the dynamic nature of collagen synthesis and its responsiveness to environmental cues.

Case Presentation

The patient, who had undergone left breast reconstruction using a textured Allergan 410 implant after cancer treatment, presented with severe capsular contracture (Baker IV) and pain. Surgery revealed two distinct fibrotic capsules:

Internal Capsule

• Tightly adherent to the textured implant.
• Characterized by highly organized, dense collagen fibers, a stark contrast to typical EDS pathology.

External Capsule

• Loosely attached to surrounding tissue.
• Exhibited the expected disorganized collagen structure of EDS.

The textured implant and both capsules were replaced with a smooth implant, leading to symptomatic improvement.

Histological and Biochemical Findings

Internal Capsule

• Displayed highly organized, dense collagen fibers reflecting high mechanical stress.
• Increased levels of myofibroblast activity (αSMA) and MCP1, markers of mechanical stress and inflammation.
• Mature collagen dominated, unlike the typical presentation in EDS.

External Capsule

• Collagen was disorganized and inconsistent, typical of EDS.
• Lower levels of inflammatory markers and mechanical stress indicators.

Mechanical Stress and Inflammation

Mechanical stress played a pivotal role in this case. The textured implant’s surface created a high-stress environment in the internal capsule, activating inflammatory pathways through myofibroblast activity and MCP1 signaling. This mechanism is consistent with processes observed in other fibrotic conditions, where physical forces lead to tissue remodeling and inflammation. These findings illustrate the direct relationship between mechanical stress and pathological tissue responses.

Broader Implications for Implant Design

The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of evidence questioning the safety of textured implants. Regulatory bodies in some countries have restricted their use due to concerns about BIA-ALCL. This case emphasizes the need to explore alternative designs, such as bioengineered surfaces that minimize mechanical stress and inflammatory responses. Advances in biomaterials could pave the way for safer implants tailored to diverse patient populations, including those with underlying connective tissue disorders.

Clinical Relevance for EDS Patients

For patients with EDS, this study highlights the importance of personalized surgical care. The unique tissue responses observed in EDS underscore the need for careful consideration of implant types and materials. Clinicians should remain vigilant for atypical inflammatory responses and tailor surgical strategies accordingly.

Historical Context

This case fits within the evolving narrative of textured implants, from their introduction as a solution to capsular contracture to their controversial association with chronic inflammation and systemic illness. By connecting implant surface characteristics to local and systemic effects, the study provides a compelling argument for re-evaluating textured implants in clinical practice.

Conclusion

This case represents a breakthrough in understanding how mechanical stress interacts with genetic collagen defects. For patients with connective tissue disorders, the findings provide critical insights into the risks and management of textured implants. The study not only deepens our understanding of implant-related complications but also paves the way for innovations in implant design, emphasizing safety and personalized care. By addressing the interplay of genetics, mechanical forces, and inflammation, this research offers a valuable framework for improving outcomes in reconstructive surgery.

Case Report:

Padmanabhan, J., Liu, F.C., Sivaraj, D., Henn, D., Chen, K., Simon, D.R., Barrera, J.A., & Gurtner, G.C. (2022). Two Independent Capsules Surrounding a Single Textured Implant in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 10(8), e4470. https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/9410635‍

‍

References

1. Nagy, É.S., & Alvarado, R. (2024). Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis. Annals of Surgery, 5(1), e398. https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC11175949
2. Janowsky, E. C., Kupper, L. L., and Hulka, B. S. (2000). Meta-analyses of the relation between silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342(11), 781–790.
3. Harris, David. (2024). What is Breast Implant Illness? Neuroimmune, The EDS Clinic, August 2024. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/what-is-breast-implant-illness-syndrome
4. Scanzi, F., et al. (2017). Are the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) and the undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) related to each other? A case-control study of environmental exposures. Immunologic Research, 65(1).
5. Harris, David. (2024). Can You Get Breast Implants with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome? Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS), The EDS Clinic, October 2024. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/can-you-get-breast-implants-with-ehlers-danlos-syndrome

‍