See a Doctor
who believes you

Comprehensive Guide to Breast Implant Illness

Updated:
December 2024
by
David Harris

Understanding Breast Implant Illness

Breast Implant Illness (BII) refers to a spectrum of symptoms that some individuals experience after undergoing breast implant surgery. These symptoms can manifest immediately or take years to appear, often leading to frustration and uncertainty for both patients and healthcare providers. Commonly reported symptoms include:

  • Chronic fatigue
  • "Brain fog" or cognitive difficulties
  • Joint and muscle pain
  • Hair loss
  • Anxiety and depression
  • Rashes or skin changes
  • Gastrointestinal issues

These symptoms have been observed with all types of breast implants—whether saline or silicone-filled, smooth or textured, round or teardrop-shaped. The lack of a clear diagnostic test or universally accepted criteria for BII complicates its recognition as an official medical diagnosis, further underscoring the need for ongoing research.

Historical Context and Evolution of BII Awareness

Concerns about the systemic effects of breast implants date back to the 1980s and 1990s. Early anecdotal reports suggested links between silicone breast implants and autoimmune disorders, prompting regulatory actions:

  • 1992: The FDA implemented a voluntary moratorium on silicone breast implants due to safety concerns.
  • 1999: A comprehensive review by the Institute of Medicine found no conclusive evidence linking implants to systemic autoimmune diseases.
  • 2006: Silicone implants were reintroduced with stricter post-market surveillance requirements.

Over the years, the growing influence of social media and patient advocacy groups has amplified public awareness of BII. Platforms like Facebook and Instagram have become hubs for patients to share experiences, pushing the medical community to take these concerns more seriously.

Reported Cases and Data

The FDA's review of medical device reports (MDRs) from 2008 to 2023 provides valuable insights into the prevalence and impact of BII:

  • Total Cases: 9,458 reports of systemic symptoms associated with breast implants.
  • Time to Onset: Symptoms developed on average 5.4 years post-implantation, though cases range widely from immediate onset to several decades later.
  • Explant Outcomes: Among 3,861 patients who underwent explantation:
    • 658 reported improvement.
    • 94 experienced no change or worsening of symptoms.

Symptoms and Associated Conditions

Commonly Reported Symptoms

The FDA identified several frequently occurring symptoms in patients with BII:

  • Fatigue (42.1%)
  • Joint pain (30.5%)
  • Anxiety (23%)
  • Brain fog (22.9%)
  • Autoimmune-like symptoms (21.1%)
  • Hair loss (20.1%)
  • Depression (17.3%)
Conditions Associated with BII

In addition to nonspecific systemic symptoms, patients with breast implants often report or develop conditions such as:

Scientific Evidence and Controversies

Research Findings

Despite decades of study, the scientific community remains divided over the systemic effects of breast implants:

  • Supportive Evidence: Some studies suggest associations between implants and autoimmune/inflammatory syndromes, including Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA). ASIA hypothesizes that silicone and other implant materials act as immune adjuvants, triggering systemic symptoms.
  • Skepticism: Critics argue that the evidence for ASIA and other implant-related syndromes is largely anecdotal, relying on case reports and studies with small sample sizes or inadequate controls.
Challenges in Research
  • The variability in symptom presentation makes it difficult to establish clear diagnostic criteria.
  • Symptoms like fatigue and anxiety are common in the general population, complicating causal links.
  • Media and social networks may influence symptom reporting, potentially skewing data.

Management and Patient Care

Preoperative Counseling

Thorough patient education is essential for informed decision-making. Surgeons should discuss:

  • Known risks of breast implants, including local complications like capsular contracture and rupture.
  • The possibility of systemic symptoms without established causality.
  • The limited predictability of outcomes after explantation.
Postoperative Care
  • Comprehensive Evaluation: Patients presenting with systemic symptoms require a holistic workup to rule out alternative causes. Recommended assessments include:
    • Blood tests (e.g., CBC, CRP, ESR, thyroid function).
    • Imaging studies (e.g., mammography, ultrasound).
    • Specialist referrals (e.g., rheumatologists for suspected autoimmune conditions).
  • Empathy and Support: Many patients feel dismissed or stigmatized when their symptoms lack a clear explanation. Healthcare providers must acknowledge their experiences and provide compassionate care.

Explantation: Decision-Making and Outcomes

Explantation is a common approach for patients who suspect their implants are causing systemic symptoms. However, its effectiveness varies:

  • Symptom Improvement: Studies estimate 50–75% of patients report some relief after explantation, though improvements may be temporary.
  • Surgical Techniques: Options include removal with or without capsulectomy. While en bloc capsulectomy (removing the implant and surrounding capsule in one piece) is often requested, its risks—such as pleural damage—must be weighed carefully.

Explantation Case Studies

Case 1: Persistent Symptoms Despite Explantation

A 38-year-old woman experienced worsening joint pain after implantation and underwent explantation 10 years later. Her symptoms persisted post-surgery, underscoring the complexity of BII and the unpredictable nature of outcomes.

Case 2: Symptom Relief Following Misdiagnosis

A 61-year-old patient with fever and systemic symptoms initially suspected BII but was ultimately diagnosed with liver carcinoma unrelated to her implants. This case highlights the need for thorough differential diagnosis.

Case 3: Immediate Improvement

A 45-year-old woman with systemic symptoms reported significant improvement immediately after explantation. While some symptoms returned months later, her case exemplifies the potential benefits of surgery for certain patients.

Celebrity Advocacy

Prominent figures with Breast Implant Illness such as Chrissy Teigen, Gisele Bündchen, and Danica Patrick have shared their experiences, fostering greater awareness:

  • Chrissy Teigen: Advocated for explantation after experiencing health concerns, sparking conversations about BII.
  • Gisele Bündchen: Noted improved health and well-being post-explantation.
  • Danica Patrick: Publicly detailed her struggles and subsequent recovery, emphasizing the importance of listening to one’s body.

Current Challenges and Future Directions

Unanswered Questions
  • What biological mechanisms underlie BII symptoms?
  • Are certain individuals more genetically or immunologically predisposed?
  • How can diagnostic tools be standardized for accurate identification?
Research Needs
  • Longitudinal Studies: Long-term follow-up of implant recipients and explanted patients.
  • Control Groups: Comparing outcomes in women with and without implants to refine causal hypotheses.
Patient Advocacy

Patient-led advocacy groups continue to drive awareness and demand accountability from implant manufacturers and regulatory bodies. These efforts are critical in advancing understanding and ensuring patient safety.

Conclusion

Breast Implant Illness represents a complex and multifaceted challenge in medicine, blending patient experiences with scientific uncertainty. While the exact mechanisms remain elusive, the profound impact on individuals’ health and quality of life necessitates continued research, education, and empathetic clinical care. Addressing BII with a holistic and evidence-based approach will help guide patients through this often-confusing landscape while advancing the broader understanding of implant-related health concerns.

FAQs about Breast Implant Illness

Why is Breast Implant Illness controversial?

Breast Implant Illness is controversial for several reasons:

  1. Lack of Formal Recognition: BII is not officially recognized as a distinct medical diagnosis by major health organizations, such as the FDA or the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This lack of formal recognition makes it challenging to develop standardized diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols.
  2. Variety of Symptoms: The symptoms associated with BII are diverse and nonspecific, including fatigue, brain fog, joint pain, and anxiety. These symptoms overlap with many other medical conditions, complicating the identification and diagnosis of BII.
  3. Limited Scientific Evidence: While many patients report symptom improvement after implant removal, the scientific evidence linking breast implants directly to these systemic symptoms is still limited and primarily observational. More rigorous, controlled studies are needed to establish a clear causal relationship.
  4. Bias and Reporting Issues: The FDA's adverse event reporting system, which collects data on BII, has significant limitations, including incomplete, inaccurate, or biased data. This can affect the reliability of the data and hinder a comprehensive understanding of BII.
  5. Conflicting Interests: The topic is further complicated by conflicting interests between patient advocacy groups, medical professionals, and the breast implant industry, which can influence public perception and research funding.
  6. Historical Context: Breast implants have a history of controversy, including past issues with silicone implants and their safety. This historical context adds to the current debate, making it a sensitive and highly scrutinized topic.

Is Breast Implant Illness related to Mast Cell Activation?

There is some evidence suggesting a potential link between Breast Implant Illness (BII) and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS). MCAS is a condition where mast cells release too many chemical mediators, causing a range of chronic symptoms. Some patients with BII report symptoms that overlap with those of MCAS, such as allergic reactions, skin rashes, and gastrointestinal issues. However, definitive research establishing a direct causal relationship between BII and MCAS is still lacking.

Is Breast Implant Illness related to Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome?

Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a group of connective tissue disorders that can cause joint hypermobility, skin that can be stretched more than usual, and a tendency to bruise easily. There is anecdotal evidence suggesting that some patients with BII also have EDS, potentially due to the connective tissue-related nature of both conditions. However, scientific studies specifically linking BII to EDS are not conclusive, and more research is needed to understand any possible connections.

Is Breast Implant Illness related to POTS?

Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is a condition that affects circulation (blood flow), characterized by the body's inability to properly regulate blood pressure and blood flow. Some patients with BII report symptoms similar to those of POTS, such as dizziness, palpitations, and fatigue. While there are anecdotal reports of patients experiencing both BII and POTS, a direct causal relationship has not been scientifically established. More research is necessary to understand if there is a significant connection.



References

  1. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. (2022). A practical guide to managing patients with systemic symptoms and breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 42(4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab375
  2. Breast Implant Illness: Medical Device Reports for Systemic Symptoms in Women with Breast Implants. (2023, June 30). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/medical-device-reports-systemic-symptoms-women-breast-implants
  3. Habib, P. M., et al. (2022). Breast Implant Illness: A Case Series. Cureus, 14(3), e23680. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23680
  4. Maijers, M. C., de Blok, C. J. M., & Niessen, F. B. (2013). Women with silicone breast implants and unexplained systemic symptoms: A descriptive cohort study. Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 71, 534-540. https://www.njmonline.nl/getpdf.php?id=1392
  5. Can Breast Implants Cause Mast Cell Activation Syndrome? (n.d.). The EDS Clinic. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/can-breast-implants-cause-mast-cell-activation-syndrome
  6. Can You Get Breast Implants with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome? (n.d.). The EDS Clinic. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/can-you-get-breast-implants-with-ehlers-danlos-syndrome
  7. Famous Celebrities with Breast Implant Illness Syndrome. (n.d.). The EDS Clinic. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/famous-celebrities-with-breast-implant-illness-syndrome
  8. Breast Surgery Outcomes with Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS). (n.d.). The EDS Clinic. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/breast-surgery-outcomes-with-hypermobile-ehlers-danlos-syndrome-heds
  9. Breast Implant Complications in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. (n.d.). The EDS Clinic. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/breast-implant-complications-ehlers-danlos-syndrome

See a Doctor
who believes you